Bottom post of the previous page:
No, gutting medicare and military retirement and healthcare benefits as some sort of goddamned conciliatory gesture to soulless republicans was punishing poor people. And that was just 1993.kaimaru wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2024 2:05 pmSo increasing income tax for the top 1.2% of the rich and putting business tax rates at 35% punishing poor people? True, those receiving social security was taxed higher, but he also reduced FICA which helped low income families. It expanded the Earned Income Tax Credit. I really don't know about military retirees other than my dad was and he never once complained about Clinton. In fact, I think Clinton in his second term was the only time he ever voted for a Democratic president. He didn't talk politics at home, but we always knew who my parents were voting for with regards to the presidencyemby wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2024 1:24 pmAnd he did it by slashing the government on the backs of the poor and military retirees. Pointless exercise.The Outsider wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2024 1:03 pm Bill Clinton is the only president since 1970 to have a balanced budget with a surplus. I don't think national debt actually matters when you're the most important (and strongest) nation on the face of the planet.
After he gets reelected in 96 he cuts Medicaid again in 97. He repeals Glass-Steagall in 99 which sets the stage for the subprime mortgage crisis.
It wasn't all bad but there's a reason why he's not revered in liberal circles today and it has nothing to do with the blowjob.